Laserdiscs, those shiny
LP size discs that a majority of people over the age of thirty know
about but have never seen in person; reflective givers of joy that in
many cases made falling asleep in-front of a film quite a dangerous
experience, especially if you were watching on a big screen or
projector as half way through you would wake to a sea of dark blue
burning into your retinas signalling the need for you to have to get
up (yep physically move), throwing blankets, beer cans and peanuts
asunder to open the disc tray to either turn the disc over, or
perhaps load another disc into the machine. Of course, there were
latterly machines that would turn the disc over for you and some that
even had a memory function that would prevent your viewing/sleeping
pleasure from being interrupted by such an incursion. However, not in
the late 70s or early 80s when they were first released. Hell, back
then a remote control on a wire was an optional extra that few could
afford.
I
imagine, with little to no thought of research to prove my assertions
(somewhat like a Fox News anchor then) that at least in Europe
and the US Laserdiscs and their players were aimed at men; they were
big expensive things and they had a rather dangerous and mysterious
sounding object in their title: Laser(s). You see, much more so back
then than now, lasers were shrouded in mystery. People knew (at least
from watching James Bond movies and the like) that if only in
their imaginations, lasers could be used to make weapons – weapons
that could melt through vault doors or burn through your legs.
Naturally, whilst these things were/are technically possible, for
reasons I won’t go into here (mainly because I don’t know
entirely what I am talking about) such applications were entirely
unlikely. However, no matter how improbable this was and how safe
consumer products with lasers in them were in actuality, like a
toddler with a feral cat, many men carried these into their home at
arm’s length and presumably stared in wonderment at them (hopefully
just the buttons and things on the outside of the case - staring at
the laser would be a bit dangerous). Adverts at the time captured the
moment quite well: Pioneer specifically had a magazine piece with
Benjamin Franklin clutching both a CD and a Laserdisc in his hands,
staring in wonderment; whilst
in the foreground Pioneer’s latest
laserdisc player took pride of place. The tag line of the advert was
“Catch the spirit of a true pioneer” – a rather obvious pun
referring to the company’s name and the pioneering nature of both
the product being sold and Franklin himself. Using lasers to do
things other than burn objects or people was in a way quite
pioneering and this, in my opinion is what makes the advert so
effective.
In some
respects, by invoking such images of pioneering endeavors and
placing such equipment in the company of great thinkers is an attempt
by the manufacturer to dull the impact of the very high price tag for
these machines. Adverts such as the one mentioned above seem to be
pragmatically implying that this product is expensive by default and
the potential consumer should be expecting and accepting of this; it
is both pioneering in nature and made by Pioneer. However, much like
Faustus selling his soul to the devil, one assumes that if your
significant other ever found out truly how much they cost, you would
wish you had too.
So other
than the wonderment surrounding the laser and the general shiny
nature of the media, what were the benefits of having such a machine
in your home? Were they worth buying and indeed is there any point in
keeping or buying one of these today? The
answer to these questions are respectively “The benefits were
limited, at least in the first instance”, “No” and “Hell
yes!” If this sounds confusing, paradoxical and oxymoronic it
probably is. However, as with all obscure technologies that are not
considered a necessity, there is a certain desirability factor that
needs to be taken into consideration. One does not need a pink VW
Beetle to go to work in, however, some people would love the idea
of owning one. Equally, one does not need to buy a Bang &
Olufsen television when something from Walmart will do the
same job insofar as allowing you to watch television. The same can be
said of Laserdisc players. They were not an essential purchase in the
‘70s, ‘80s or ‘90s and they most certainly are not an essential
purchase now. However, I personally made it my mission to buy one
after (oddly enough) seeing my maths teacher watching a film on one
in his office. With that preamble out of the way, on with the
vindication of my (and presumably the actions of many before me)
laserdisc purchasing decisions:
The first
laserdiscs (films) sold into the consumer marketplace were
simultaneously labelled LaserVision or Laser Video Discs.
The term Laserdisc wasn’t really used that much till a few
years later. In any case, those early LaserVision discs (of
which I have several) were recorded with an analogue, single channel
sound track and it seems that the video “file” was a direct
transfer of the master tape of the original film. Note that I said
tape. Whilst Laserdisc always was an analogue format and not
digital, these early discs seem to have the artifacts of the tape
from which they were copied onto them and as such the image/sound
replicates the “noise” that would be associated with watching the
same content on a tape based player. So, in effect were you
essentially buying a player much like a VCR with the same tape
degradation issues? Put simply, no. Whilst Laserdiscs do degrade over
time, the degradation is a much more gradual process and is more the
result of a physical oxidation; usually bought on as a consequence of
poor storage and handling whereas, if you watched a video cassette,
the physical movement of the heads over the tape cause it to stretch
and damage so that this damage is evident in subsequent viewings.
Thus, Laserdisc film recordings mirror exactly the artifacts found on
the original tape media that was used to transfer the content onto
the disc. However, these artifacts become a part of the recording and
remain constant. They are not indicative of the gradual degradation
of the media as Laserdiscs don’t degrade in this way. In summary
however, if I had been around when the first players were available
and bought a copy of Death Wish (for example) and eagerly
placed it in my top-loading machine, I would have been disappointed.
Yes I could watch the film over and over again without the picture
quality degrading and yes the sound would be better. However,
equally, I could just buy a new copy of my favourite films on VHS
several times over as and when they got stretched instead of
investing so much money in this new piece of equipment.
That
said, as the product matured, so too did the technology used to
transfer the video content onto the Laserdiscs themselves and image
quality improved greatly with less evident artifacts Furthermore, as
stereo sound became more prevalent, discs were recorded with both
stereo digital soundtracks as opposed to the analogue monophonic
sound of the early releases. Also, when companies such as THX
(a spin-out of Lucasfilm) and Dolby started encoding
films such as the Star Wars and Indiana Jones trilogy,
purchasing a Laserdisc player became a more rewarding experience. To
my mind the sound quality is absolutely fantastic with THX or
Dolby encoded discs and depending upon the compression ratio
of a film recorded on DVD, a Laserdisc version of the same
movie can look markedly better.
So to
conclude, if you are of the geeky persuasion or just simply like
watching films I can definitely recommend buying a player. I
personally gain hours of pleasure from watching films on these
machines and the artwork on the LP-sized covers for the physical
media is often fantastic. Yes, as the product reached the end of its
life in the mid-nineties, studios got a bit lazy and instead of
turning out beautifully designed gate-fold covers they just had
pictures placed on the back and front of a single sleeve, but the
early special edition or box-set versions of films truly are
something to behold. Also, there are some films that were released on
Laserdisc that have never made it to DVD due to copyright
issues for soundtracks and other reasons so it is possible that you
can pick up an obscure title that may be worth a small fortune in the
future. That said, there are many drawbacks and pitfalls to buying
such equipment and media. This will probably be the subject of
another post. However, in summary, like many retro items these
players have gained quite a cult following over the years and have
gone from being “useless” items that most people didn't want
and as such could be picked up from places like Cash Converters
for around £30.00 and thrift stores and boot sales for far less, to
items that have such prefixes as “RARE” or suffixes such as “This
cost £1000 when new, grab yourself a bargain and buy this now at
[insert ridiculous price here]”. It is true that these machines are
becoming more obscure as with all consumer electronics – eventually
they fail and end up in landfill. This issue is compounded by the
fact that these are notoriously difficult to repair by hobbyists that
do not have specialist knowledge and long gone are the days when you
could take such a player to your average TV repair shop. That said,
in many respects, it is because of these issues that you should
consider such purchases carefully. Should you really invest £150 or
more in an average player or £500+ on a flagship model that is
inevitably going to break at some point in the near future? I would
suggest not. So, if you are thinking of buying one, consider
importing from the US (please note that American NTSC players unless
stated will not play PAL, European discs) as players seem to be
cheaper there. Or, hope that you get lucky on an eBay auction or
thrift store find.